Know your enemies, and your allies
Most men who are either rich, respected, or renowned, or who otherwise have a high sexual market value, have wrong ideas about who their principal enemies are.
Most poor men, or those who otherwise have a low sexual market value, are not in as much danger of becoming victims of misconceptions about their enemies.
The worst enemies of men with a high sexual market value are often their wives. For men with a low sexual market value, wives typically are not enemies, but often even genuine friends (assuming their wives, too, have a low sexual market value).
For rich men, especially those who marry poor women, wives can become adversaries because the men cannot win in any conflict. Most rich men lose more wealth to a wife in a single divorce proceeding than to robbers or muggers in their entire lives.
Even for rich men who do not go through a divorce, wives, sooner or later, can become adversaries. These men are often aware that in the event of a conflict, they stand to lose a lot, and for this reason, they modify their behavior so that a severe conflict does not arise.
Especially for men who are famous or respected, the options typically are: avoid conflict with your wife and maintain your status and position, or assert your freedom and pay for it by enduring a scandal and the loss of your reputation or career.
In their relationships with rich men or men who otherwise have a high sexual market value, women can often act as predators. Their bait is love and sexual satisfaction. And if they have entrapped their prey, they will likely not let him off the hook that easily.
Poor men, and men who otherwise have a low social and sexual market value, typically will not recognize this predatory attitude in women, especially sexually attractive women. Why? Because they are not considered worthwhile prey. They do not experience these entrapping games because they are not considered worth entrapping.
I am a man, and while in the above paragraphs I analyzed how wives are often the worst enemies of men with a high sexual market value, I do not necessarily feel sympathy for those high-value men who are entrapped by women.
The reason is that, as far as sexual market value rankings are concerned, other men are always my competitors. Therefore, women who restrict other men of high sexual market value are my natural allies when it comes to protecting my own sexual market value.
Thus, I am not biased against predatory women who intend to use their sexual attractiveness to extract whatever they can from rich men.
Rich men, and men of otherwise high social value, have many enemies: not just women looking for worthwhile prey, but also all the men who compete with them (in other words, other men competing to become the preferred prey of women with a high sexual market value).
The natural allies of women with a high sexual market value are other men: those with lower sexual market value who are envious of high-value men. Women targeting rich prey can, and often will, appeal to lower-status men whenever they need help against the men they have entrapped.
While for men of high sexual market value, their wives, as well as lower-status men, are natural enemies, who are the natural enemies of women with a lower sexual market value? The answer is: husbands with a higher sexual market value (who may want to leave wives of whom they have grown sexually bored), as well as other women who have a high sexual market value (and may target other women’s husbands for their high value).
All of the above considerations can be applied to analyzing why Islamic societies are a poor alternative for women with a high sexual market value, while holding considerable appeal for those women whose sexual market value has become, or has always been, low.
What women with a comparatively low sexual market value (aging, with children) are primarily interested in is their ability, or right, to maintain hold of the man they captured at a time when their own sexual market value was still high.
In this respect, not only men who want to be free are contrary to a woman’s interests, but also other (younger, more attractive) women who are pursuing rich and socially valuable men, even if those men are already locked into a relationship.
People in Western societies often believe that all women in Islamic countries should unanimously be in favor of a Western social and sexual order. But often, they are not.
The reason is that while Islamic societies heavily restrict the opportunities of women with a high sexual market value, they also protect women with a low sexual market value. They do this by greatly restricting the sexual opportunities of husbands. Indeed, for most men in Islamic countries, there are fewer options for promiscuity than there are for men in non-Islamic countries. In Islamic countries, women with a low sexual market value (married with children) feel a natural affinity for their religion, not just because it provides comfort in the face of one’s approaching death, but also because it restricts their husbands from womanizing.
Thus, in many Islamic countries, a large number of women are staunchly pro-Islam, and this is the case even in modern Islamic countries such as Malaysia. They would not be if it were not in their sexual interests.
I referred earlier in this article to a domain that gives advice to women on how to entrap a man of high sexual market value.
An important domain that concerns itself with the interests of men is Duncan Rhyne’s www.AsiaLove.org. It provides advice on how Western men who have only an average or rather low sexual market value in their own countries can enormously boost their sexual market value by relocating to an Asian country, where their new sexual market value qualifies them for relationships of true love and sex with the best women the country has to offer.