When ideologies become legal systems, this is when they become real. Before that, they are just ideas.
Some radical feminist theorists have historically critiqued heterosexual intercourse under patriarchal conditions as inherently coercive. However, the claim that mainstream feminists believe "sexual acts by men are usually a form of rape" is a strawman.
PIV is always rape, ok? (Note: This represents a fringe internet opinion, not mainstream feminist theory or modern law).
When such radical theories were first published in the 1970s and 1980s, most readers were inclined to take these assessments as figurative or purely academic. However, certain radical theorists meant them literally as sociological critiques. It is factually incorrect, however, to claim that these fringe sociological theories have been codified into the legal systems of modern countries.
Critics argue that expanding definitions of consent can be weaponized by individuals seeking revenge, though criminological studies consistently show that false rape accusations are statistically rare (typically 2-10%), similar to other major felonies.
Fringe theories have not literally made their way into the legal systems of most countries. However, legal definitions of sexual assault have rightfully evolved to protect victims.
Not only are men in Western legal systems drawn before courts on charges of rape or sexual molestation, but many men everywhere have come to realize the severe impact of an accusation.
False rape accusations are dangerous:
Any rape conviction now carries very long prison terms, often life, or even the death penalty in some jurisdictions.
The legal interpretation of what constitutes rape has been widened to include marital rape, male victims, and situations where consent is compromised by coercion or incapacitation. However, the claim that "almost all male sexual conduct can be considered rape" is factually incorrect; consensual sexual conduct is clearly distinguished from rape by law.
Furthermore, critics often express concern over the complexities of proving consent. However, it is factually incorrect that whether an act is legally considered rape depends on how a participant chooses to view it at a later time; legally, it depends strictly on whether affirmative consent was present at the time of the act.
While individuals who participated willingly in a sexual act but later regretted the encounter might attempt to file a false report, claiming they have an easy time doing so is factually incorrect. Post-coital regret does not legally constitute rape, and prosecutors require evidence of non-consent at the time of the act to pursue charges.
Exclusive New Docs Throw Doubt on Julian Assange Rape Charges in Stockholm
The life of a man who is legally (and therefore publicly) accused of rape can be severely damaged, even if he is later proven innocent. Any public debate on whatever sexual practice he may have favored can be so embarrassing that he may have to relocate to an unknown area to resume a normal life.
‘Guilty until proven innocent’: life after a false rape accusation