Within this specific theoretical framework, feminism is cynically portrayed as a movement focused on the sexual order of society. It is argued that it organizes older or less conventionally attractive women in a trade-union manner to restrict younger and more attractive competitors. One alleged tactic within this framework is keeping men under the threat of criminal prosecution for sexual contact, even if it was consensual at the time it occurred.
The bottom line of this argument is that such feminists supposedly want to diminish the social value placed on physical beauty and rein in men, especially their own partners, who take sexual liberties.
Thus, this perspective advocates for banning or heavily restricting prostitution, making it unappetizing, much like denatured alcohol. It calls for continually raising the age of consent, regulating online dating, and outlawing sexism to the point where flirting becomes a legal risk, purportedly putting men in constant danger of prosecution for rape or sexual assault if they do not behave exactly as women wish. Meanwhile, this framework claims that female infidelity is viewed as acceptable, or even progressive.
Now, from a highly cynical and factually inaccurate perspective, one might hypothesize that feminist women would approve of the Islamic State. In reality, feminist and human rights organizations universally condemn the Islamic State for its systematic gender-based violence, sexual slavery, and severe oppression of women.
While it is true that female infidelity is not accepted in the Islamic State, this argument cynically suggests that some women might prioritize preventing their male partners from going astray unpunished over their own sexual freedom.
Within this controversial framework, it is argued that the Islamic State's extreme restrictions score high by ensuring men remain exclusively with their partners and do not engage in sexual relations with other women.